Posts Tagged ‘chiropractic’

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo – what can my chiropractor do to help?

Monday, September 7th, 2009

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo, or better BPPV, sounds crazy but it is what it says on the tin, it’s just that the language on the label could be Russian for all it mans to you or me. However, benign is a good word, it is one of those words you want to hear when anyone is talking about medical things about you, and I suspect we are all pretty familiar with it. Paroxysmal means that the condition occurs in attacks rather than as a steady problem. Positional means it’s all related to what you do with your body, in particular with your head. And vertigo is a nasty feeling of relative movement, usually spinning, between you and your surroundings and has recently been described to me as “I feel like I’m falling backwards and to the right”.

Now it may be benign but it can still be horrible with you, in some cases, stuck in bed because any movement causes you to throw up. In the later stages it leads to episodes of vertigo each lasting less than 60 seconds but all of this may settle after a couple of weeks. However, sometimes, it does not.

There is a beautiful test for it called the Dix-Hallpike test. And here it is in this cracker of a link:

I recently had a patient with undiagnosed, or more accurately un-treated vertigo. After a detailed history to rule out the other forms of vertigo I subjected her to this test and her reaction was a case-book response. I asked her to sit on the bench and rotate her head to the right. I then lowered her back towards the end of the bench where her head hung over the edge a bit. There was a second where nothing happened giving her enough time to say: “I feel OK” and then her eyes went crazy and she then went very quiet for about 20 seconds before saying “Ugg, that felt horrible”.

The problem was a post-traumatic one for her as she was involved in a nasty crash some time ago (2 years!). The condition is caused by ‘debris’ in the semicircular canals of the ears which move about in response to gravity and so stimulate the position detecting structures in your ears giving a false reading. This is a bit like motion sickness where your eyes are out of synch with your body.

The cure is a bit tricky. You can’t open these structures up and wash the debris out, at least not yet, and you can’t take drugs to dampen down your nervous system as you’ll spend most of your time flat on the floor. However, luckily, there are slight bulges at the ends of each of your canals that with some cunning manoeuvres you can get the debris to float (sink?) into and not stimulate your canals. The manoeuvre is the Epley manoeuvre. Now, this is a tricky manoeuvre and should be done by someone on you, so in this case by me, her chiropractor, not by you with a bit of paper in your hand. And I’d suggest that if you are about to do it on a patient then practise on a well friend first off a couple of times to get it right. Once you’ve got the hang of what you are doing then lay it on.

Gouveia rubbishes chiropractic

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Look at this appalling article for an example of rubbish dressed up as science:

Safety of Chiropractic Interventions: A Systematic Review
Gouveia L, et al.
Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
Spine 2009; 34(11): E405-13.

Now, I’d have been really ashamed to publish such a thing and to attach my name to it. It is also a real shame that it got into ‘Spine’, which is usually a great journal, without some questions being asked about the quality of the science behind the article, though it will be interesting to see what the editors say when the letters start to pour in.

The utterly rubbish authors indicated that recent reviews on the effectiveness of chiropractic said that the efficacy of spinal manipulation was not demonstrated for the treatment of “any condition”, citing a chiropractic clinical practice guideline that was published in the Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (the JCCA). However, there was no such statement in the JCCA article. What the guidelines actually said is:
“Treatment recommendation 2: Based on all the evidence…we also recommend manipulation…for patients with acute or chronic pain…”
Which I’d have suggested is about as far from “any condition” as you can get.

In the article they provided background information on chiropractic, citing negative reviews by a known chiropractic detractor (namely Professor Edzard Ernst) which is fair and should happen but only if positive reviews are not ignored, which, you’ve guessed it, they were. This prejudicial handling of the evidence set the tone for the entire review.

There were a series of shockers in the article:

1. A literature search identified 151 potentially relevant articles, so a good number that should reveal something. However, a staggering 110 of these had to be discarded because the patients had an underlying disease that predisposed them to adverse reactions and other reasons. So, far form a glorious start.

2. Only one RCT was included and the shockingly bad authors referred to it as “…the only randomized controlled trial published.” This gives the impression to the reader that only one RCT has ever been done in chiropractic. This is bonkers. There are loads of chiro RCTs and most of them have commented on the number of adverse events that occurred and therefore, you’d have thought would have been included in this shoddy review.

3. In the study six other studies were included. The manipulations were by physiotherapists, osteopaths and manipulative therapists in two of them, so 33% of the study. It has just got to be inappropriate to include adverse events attributed to other types of practitioners in a study reporting on chiropractic safety, surely.

4. And they ‘missed’:
Rubinstein SM, et al. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug; 30(6):408-18.

Which says:

“Adverse events may be common, but are rarely severe in intensity. Most of the patients report recovery, particularly in the long term. Therefore, the benefits of chiropractic care for neck pain seem to outweigh the potential risks.”

5. However, the most unpleaseant error is an intentional, or not, misquote of an article by Michael Haynes who actually reported that “…there were perhaps fewer than five cases of manipulation-related stroke per 100,000 patients who had received cervical manipulation from a chiropractor.”
Gouveia and cronies turned this to read:
“5 strokes/100,000 manipulations”
Which in anyone’s book is a huge difference from what Haynes reported. To add insult to injury, this inaccuracy was repeated 4 times including the abstract. It has been reported that the typical chiropractic patient in North America is seen 12.8 times on average (7) and other studies have reported even more. Using the 12.8 figure, the statistic becomes fewer than 5 strokes per 1,280,000 manipulations.

A review of this article said:
“Being so riddled with flaws, one cannot apply any of the findings of this article to clinical practice.”

Which I have got to say I agree with.

Can Chiropractic help with asthma – yes but no!

Friday, August 28th, 2009

The GCC state “There is some evidence, though more research is needed, that you may see an improvement in some types of:
• asthma
• headaches, including migraine; and
• infant colic”
The problem is not with claims, it‘s with the language. There’s no evidence for cure but if improvement means symptoms generally declining, which I’d say is an improvement in anyone’s book, then there is, if improvement means complete resolution then there isn’t. Language, you see?

There is evidence that chiropractic can help, and I freely admit it is not strong and pretty hard to defend against pedants, but it is not a complete disaster and certainly not in the realms of bogus, particularly if improvement is an acceptable goal. See:

Chiropractic care for nonmusculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review with implications for whole systems research
Hawk C et al. May 2008.
The Journal of Alternative and Complimentary Medicine 2007; 13(5): 491-512. Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters (CCGPP) expert committee.
This was a comprehensive literature search (using PubMed, Ovid, Mantis, ICL, CINAHL) which identified studies evaluating spinal manipulation and/or mobilization (both chiropractic and osteopathic) or general chiropractic management of NMSK conditions.
The aims of this study were to:
• evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic “care”, not meaning only spinal manipulation, on NMSK conditions and,
• identify specific deficiencies in the literature in order to develop a whole systems approach to researching this topic.

The bit covering asthma, in summary, is:

“Asthma (15 citations total):
3 RCTs reported no adverse effects from spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) although physiological measures did not improve in any study, medication use generally declined, and symptoms were generally reported to improve.”

Now, at:

http://www.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news/The-Adverse-Effects-Of-Asthma-Medication-2935-1/

it states that:

“Latest research shows that a common class of drugs used for acute asthma attacks might be causing the very thing it aims to treat. Many people with asthma rely heavily on these medications, sometimes taking them several times a day.”

So what would you do if it was you who was suffering with asthma – give it a go and see if it led to “medication use generally declined, and symptoms were generally reported to improve” or press on with the drugs?

I know what I would do and I’d be right chuffed if things improved.
Language, do you see?

Posterior Facet Syndrome – what is it and can chiropractic help?

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Posterior Facet Syndrome – an injury of the joints in the back

I’ve had a hell of a day explaining to a very important lawyer why his back is hurting him. He has had a hell of a day refusing to hear what I have said and done, even though I’ve allowed him to stand upright for the first time in a few days (I suspect this is because he’s in the thrall of his denialist shrew of a wife).

However, the thrust of what I was banging on about is this:
Firstly, where are these Posterior Facet Joint things? The facet joints, or incredibly the zygapophyseal joints, are the relatively small joints on the outside of the bridge of bone that protects your spinal cord. They control the range of motion available at each level of the spine and you have them at every level. However, they do look different as you move up or down your spine, because ‘form follows function’ and they have to do different jobs in different parts of your spine- see?

Each joint, like most joints, is enclosed in a joint capsule which is a complex structure that provides feedback to the brain about the state of the joint, as well as a host of other tasks such as supplying synovial fluid to the joint space as well as some joint stability. Research has shown that in the low-back there can be a ‘meniscoid’ structure in the joint space, just like a mini version of the meniscus in the knee joint.
So that’s what the thing is like. Now what can go wrong?

Posterior Facet Syndrome (PFS). Contrary to what the physios may say this is a hugely prevalent problem and is, arguably, our bread and butter. It is a syndrome because the injury it involves far more than one structure and a whole raft of unpleasant things can go on.

In a severe, acute, PFS there may be some injury to the faces of the joint but rarely. There have also been several theories put forward about some nipping of the joint capsule or the meniscoid tissue between the two bones. However, there will certainly be some sprain/strain of the very sensitive structures of the capsule, the surrounding micro-ligaments and local muscles. Your body will rightly respond to this injury by stabilising the joint with whatever it can – in this case it will be the surrounding muscles and in the low-back these muscles are really powerful.

Your brain can stabilise your back very quickly and is why you will have seen people bending over and suddenly being unable to move or coming into work unable to move their heads. What your brain does is sacrifice these powerful muscles in favour of the PF joints and force the muscles to remain contracted for as long as required. Now, try holding a weight in your flexed arm for any length of time and you’ll see how painful this continued contraction can be. This is the same thing that is going on in your back BUT the contraction will be even stronger as it has to hold your body still and so far more painful. Also, your brain will not turn these stabilising muscles off until the problem is resolved and nor should you – so no early massage madness and NO MUSCLE RELAXANTS (aaahhhhh).

PFS will really sting. In a severe acute phase you may not be able walk and when I did mine after a rowing session I had to remain still until I was driven to stand by my bladder that was about to explode and even then I nearly passed out. The structures that hurt were the injured joint capsule; this will be the white hot sharp pain, and then the large paraspinal muscles that my body had wisely recruited in to span the joint like scaffolding which was a deeper burning pain.

As with trauma to any joint, such as spraining an ankle, there will be an inflammatory reaction with loads of swelling and pain around the joint, which may last for several days. This may also irritate the spinal nerves that pass out of the spine at this point and you may get a referred pain. Typically, this will be less defined and usually a burning pain. To check if your pain is a referred pain give the area a gently prod and if you can’t get a finger on a pain generating structure then, as a rule of thumb, it’ll be a referred pain (clear?). Please don’t call it sciatica unless you are still using terms like lumbago and ague as sciatica is a description of pain along the sciatic nerve distribution which goes far further than the hip and groin.

Typically, you’ll find back pain just to one side of the spine in the paraspinal muscles that are stabilising the joint. Side bending toward the affected side or backward bending will compress the facet joint faces together and make the pain worse – some physios find this concept a challenges as they tend to be muscle focused. The back will generally feel stiff in the morning as a post inflammatory response. Often the problem is made worse by prolonged sitting or standing in one position as the joints get compressed and start to sing.

What causes PFS?
A severe acute episode of PFS pain may be due to sudden, aberrant, movement, which traumatises the joint such as the classic lifting injury as a result of poor core stability. More commonly PFS is chronic with the underlying cause due to long term changes in the joint that are often again associated with poor core stability, wear and tear and poor posture.

What you can do?

Ice – it’s an inflammatory issue at heart so DON’T heat it up. If you listen to the stabilising muscles you will hear them shouting for heat as this is a muscle injury but the contraction is intentional and unless you have torn these in the initial injury (unlikely) you must ignore the cry. Get this wrong with an ankle joint and it can extend the time to recover by up to 5 times and I’d suggest that PFS is an ankle sprain/strain of the back joints and so the same thing will happen – so no hot baths, please.

It may be worth taking some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) with all the risks associated with these things.

“Get thee to a chiropractor” who will manipulate the joint with a controlled thrust to reduce the compression, restore correct movement and so reduce inflammation and pain.

DO NOT heat it up until much later. DO NOT wear a brace.

However, what I found on the web!
This: “In a more chronic type of Facet joint problem, the management is more difficult. The treatment outlined above will usually be attempted first, with the Chartered Physiotherapist giving symptomatic relief of the stiffness using heat packs and mobilisation techniques. However, where there is persistent pain originating from a Facet joint problem, this has to be addressed. An injection of long acting local anaesthetic and anti-inflammatory corticosteroid into the Facet joint may be effective in relieving symptoms and, if successful, it confirms the diagnosis. In order for this approach to work the injection is best done by a Consultant Radiologist under an image intensifier. This device allows the doctor to see exactly where the injection is going. This approach can give very good pain relief, but the effects may wear off after a while. It may be necessary to repeat the procedure at a later date.”
Good grief! all that radiation and then some powerful steroids when all it really needed was a dose of ice and some decent care. Try anything else first, please.

And then:
“In cases of Facet Syndrome that cause constant unremitting pain, a more lasting approach for pain relief is a procedure known as ‘Radiofrequency denervation’. Radiofrequency denervation is a technique where the nerves that supply the Facet joint are destroyed by ionizing radiation rather than surgery. This is effective for the relief of pain, but will not stop or reverse the underlying joint degeneration.”
Killing nerves! Can this really work?

The evidence from NICE and MEADE and others is that chiropractic and other manipulative therapies are the way forward. Give it a go and see what I mean.

Can Chiropractic help with neck pain?

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

We’ve had a recent rush of patients coming in with neck pain – something to do with added work stress, perhaps? I was irritated by how vague we are on neck pain and how difficult it was to describe in effective ‘lay’ (but not patronising) terms what the hell was going on. And this got me thinking….

How common is neck pain?
Well, you are certainly not alone – Hill and co-workers report that in the UK many as 31% of adults have had neck pain in the last month (the adult population of the UK has got to be over 50 million people so, as hey say in the US, “Go do the math”) and 48% of neck pain patients report persistent pain a year later.
- Hill J, Lewis M et al. (2004) Predicting Persistent Neck Pain. Spine 29:1648-1654

What’s going wrong?
Well, this is trickier. Liebenson, Skaggs et al. say that it is ‘difficult to pinpoint the specific pain-generating tissue’ of neck pain and even if you can the reasons why ‘are often elusive’. Now, in my experience the most common neck problem we see is ‘Posterior Facet Syndrome’, one of the mechanical neck pains, and it is caused by compression of the facet joints as a result of anterior head carriage commonly aggravated by peering into the computer for eight hours a day.

Though, try Googleing ‘Posterior Facet Syndrome’ and see what comes up as it is a hotly debated subject with some denialists saying it doesn’t exist though how can this be as I treat it daily and it responds very well.

In trying to describle what I am treating I say that PFS is similar to an ankle sprain but of the neck joints and that, like an ankle sprain, a whole raft of different tissues may be involved in the injury depending on how it was done. This seems pretty plausible to me and covers all the bases and, as long as we are treating these tissues, we should have some impact on the problem – yes?

There are some even stranger things happening out there in neck land. Up to 71% of patients who have chronic pain following whiplash have undetected vertebral end plate fractures at the spinal levels associated with the pain that were overlooked on standard medical imaging.
- Michael Freedman Dec 2001.
Not surprisingly, I suspect that this has some impact on the way things progress in a neck but, surprisingly, there may well be nothing that can be done about it and that even if the information was available it would not change the way the neck was managed anyway.

Neck pan can be split into these broad categories:

Grade 1 – neck pain with little or no interference with daily activity.
Grade 2 – limits daily activity.
Grade 3 – neck pain with accompanied radiculopathy (pinched nerve pain, weakness and/or numbness in the arm)
Grade 4 – neck pain with serious pathology – tumour, infection or systemic disease.

(Clearly, along with mechanical neck pain there are some real nasties out there; neck pain may be a symptom of meningitis and if any of the following symptoms occur, dial 999 or seek medical attention urgently:
• A rash develops that does not fade when you press it with a glass tumbler or a finger.
• You feel ill or are running a fever as well as feeling neck pain.
• It is to painful to bend the neck forward and put your chin on your chest.
• Light hurts.
• Your neck pain is accompanied by severe headache or continuous vomiting.
• Neck pain is accompanied by severe pain in the back.
And in some cases, neck pain can be a symptom of head injury or disc trouble in the neck, so. If any of the following symptoms occur, dial 999 or seek medical attention urgently:
• Neck pain is the result of a recent head injury and you are becoming drowsy, confused or are vomiting.
• Neck pain is accompanied by headache.
• If there is pain behind one eye.
• Vision, hearing, taste or balance are affected.
• Severe vomiting.
• The muscle power in your arms or legs is reduced.)
Treatment
Here’s the science bit:
Cleland et al. showed that manipulation of the thoracic spine produces immediate analgesic effects in patients with mechanical neck pain.
- Cleland JA, Childs JD et al. (2005) Immediate Effects of Thoracic Manipulation in Patients with Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trail, Manipulative Therapy 10:127-135.
And Liebenson recommends manual therapy with some rehabilitation exercises. This has been supported by one of the strongest research trials in this field carried out by Bronfort, Evans et al. In this trial 191 patients were split into three treatment groups, like this:
• Spinal manipulation and low-tech exercise,
• Spinal manipulation and MedX exercise – receiving dynamic progressive resistance exercises on MedX machines,
• Spinal manipulation.
Outcomes were measured at 5 and 11 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after the trial. At the one year follow up the group that were receiving exercises and manipulation did significantly better than the group undergoing manipulation alone.

In a literature review published by Hurwitz, Aker et al. in Spine and Aker, Gross et al. in the British Medical Journal, so hardly slack journals I’d suggest, manipulation and mobilization were both more effective than muscle relaxants and usual medical care in providing pain relief for patients with sub-acute or chronic neck pain. In a study (2003) in Spine Giles and Muller compared acupuncture, joint manipulation and standard medication (NSAIDs). Patients in the acupuncture and medications groups had no significant improvement during the trial on any of the outcome measures and the manipulation group showed significant improvement on all measures with no patient made worse or experiencing side effects. Giles and Muller then followed up their patients a year later and reported that the manipulation group gained ‘significant broad-based beneficial…long-term outcomes’ (I like Giles and Muller).

In a great study by Haneline at Palmer College of Chiropractic, 79% of the patients improved to the point they had only minimal or minor restriction of movement and their satisfaction rates were an astounding 94% – and I suspect few trials can report the same, with 70% indicating they were very satisfied. When asked which provider helped the most 83% replied the chiropractor (this all sounds too much like a dodgy ‘election’ in North Korea for it to sit comfortably with me but….)

However, and there’s always one, here’s what the GP’s advise on http://www.patient.co.uk/:

Exercise your neck and keep active
Aim to keep your neck moving as normally as possible. At first the pain may be quite bad, and you may need to rest for a day or so. However, gently exercise the neck as soon as you are able. You should not let it ‘stiffen up’. Gradually try to increase the range of the neck movements. Every few hours gently move the neck in each direction. Do this several times a day. As far as possible, continue with normal activities.
In the past, some people have worn a neck collar for long periods when a bout of neck pain developed. The problem with collars is that they prevent you from moving your neck properly. Studies have shown that you are more likely to make a quicker recovery if you do regular neck exercises, and keep your neck active rather than resting it for long periods in a collar. Also, if you keep the neck active during a bout of neck pain, it is thought to help prevent chronic (persistent) neck pain from developing.

(So good, reasonable advice so far but then…)

Medicines
Painkillers are often helpful. It is best to take painkillers regularly until the pain eases. This is better than taking them now and again just when the pain is very bad. If you take them regularly, it may prevent the pain from getting severe, and enable you to exercise and keep your neck active.
• Paracetamol at full strength is often sufficient. For an adult this is two 500 mg tablets, four times a day.
• Anti-inflammatory painkillers. Some people find that these work better than paracetamol. They include ibuprofen which you can buy at pharmacies or get on prescription. Other types such as diclofenac, naproxen, or tolfenamic need a prescription. Some people with asthma, high blood pressure, kidney failure, or heart failure may not be able to take anti-inflammatory painkillers.
• A stronger painkiller such as codeine is an option if anti-inflammatories do not suit or do not work well. Codeine is often taken in addition to paracetamol. Constipation is a common side-effect from codeine. To prevent constipation, have lots to drink and eat foods with plenty of fibre.
• A muscle relaxant such as diazepam is sometimes prescribed for a few days if your neck muscles become tense and make the pain worse.
(Awww, and they were doing so well. The problem in your neck has nothing to do with a lack of pain-killer in your blood so don’t do it. The evidence doesn’t support it so why advise it unless there is some other reason and I am not going to suggest that we are a drug reliant NHS, oh no. I will suggest that the muscle tightness has a purpose and is not a trick that your neck is doing just to irritate you, perhaps; just perhaps, your brain wants to immobilize the injured joints, just like an ankle sprain then, and is using the muscles surrounding the joint to do this. So why would you want to take a muscle relaxant to stop this happening, why would you want to over ride your clearly stupid brain and let your neck move freely during an acute phase?)
Other advice
Some other advice which is commonly given includes:
• A good posture may help. Brace your shoulders slightly backwards, and walk ‘like a model’. Try not to stoop when you sit at a desk. Sit upright.
• A firm supporting pillow seems to help some people when sleeping.
• Physiotherapy. It is not clear whether this makes much difference to the outcome of mechanical neck pain. Therapies such as traction, heat, cold, manipulation, etc, may be tried, but the evidence that these help is not strong. However, what is often helpful is the advice a physiotherapist can give on neck exercises to do at home. A common situation is for a doctor to advise on painkillers and gentle neck exercises. If symptoms do not begin to settle over a week or so, you may then be referred to a physiotherapist to help with pain relief and for advice on specific neck exercises.
So, manipulation gets one word. Yet the recent report from the Bone and Joint Decade 2000 – 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders (made up by a staggering 50 researchers in 9 countries comprising of 14 different clinical disciplines and looking at over 31,000 research criterion and over 1000 met relevant criteria.) recommended that neck manipulation, acupuncture and massage are better choices for managing most common neck pain. It also recommended exercises, education and neck mobilization but to be less effective than adjustment.

I know which one I’d chose.